Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Evaluation of the Sustainable Public Space’s Indicators

Authors

  • Monica Sheira Department ofArchitecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.
  • Susilo Kusdiwanggo Department ofArchitecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v15i2.648

Keywords:

accessibility, governance, public space, sustainable, vitality

Abstract

Growing discussions on public space highlight the need for a more structured understanding of sustainability indicators across diverse urban contexts. This study examines these indicators across 22 selected articles using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and then tests them through an empirical example of the Prawirotaman Street corridor in Yogyakarta to observe how the theoretical concepts operate in practice. The analysis integrates SLR findings with primary data such as field observations and interviews to assess the degree of indicator fulfilment in real public-space conditions. The study offers a comprehensive indicator model and demonstrates its partial applicability in the local context, providing a novel evaluative framework for future public space assessments in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] J. Li, A. Dang, and Y. Song, “Defining the ideal public space: A perspective from the publicness,” J. Urban Manag., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 479–487, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.005.

[2] P. Milbourne, “Growing public spaces in the city: Community gardening and the making of new urban environments of publicness,” Urban Stud., vol. 00, no. 0, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0042098020972281.

[3] M. Carmona, “Principles for public space design, planning to do better,” URBAN Des. Int., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2019, doi: 10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.

[4] M. E. E. Dinçer, S. Akyüz, and B. A. Etike, “Quality Assessment of Public Spaces: The Case of Beyazit Square and Its Surroundings,” Civ. Eng. Archit., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1675–1686, 2022, doi: 10.13189/cea.2022.100436.

[5] A. Shukla and P. Chhabra, “Appraising Inclusivity of Public Place: A Case of Residential Neighbourhoods for Jalandhar City,” Civ. Eng. Archit., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1609–1622, 2022, doi: 10.13189/cea.2022.100430.

[6] S. Alvarado, V. Frank, A. Mafalda, P. Soares, and M. Karin, Using a digital participatory platform to evaluate public space quality, vol. 90, no. 3. Springer Netherlands, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10708-025-11383-9.

[7] J. Hamdani, P. A. Molina, L. L. Fuentes, H. Shawqy, G. Rossi, and D. A. León, “What Is My Plaza for? Implementing a Machine Learning Strategy for Public Events Prediction in the Urban Square,” Urban Plan., vol. 10, no. 8551, pp. 1–19, 2025, doi: 10.17645/up.i388.

[8] M. Said and B. Tempels, “Challenges in managing public space: insights from public space management practice,” J. Environ. Plan. Manag., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 519–538, 2025, doi: 10.1080/09640568.2023.2263635.

[9] A. Ghavimi, F. Schuessler, and R. Pesch, “Heliyon A framework to evaluate public green spaces with an emphasis on recreational values for sustainable urban and rural areas : A systematic review and content analysis,” Heliyon, vol. 11, no. 2, p. e41553, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41553.

[10] I. Yaralioglu and C. Kara, “Sustainable Urban Design Approach for Public Spaces Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Land, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 1–30, 2025, doi: 10.3390/land14010019.

[11] R. B. Naya, P. de la C. Nicolas, C. D. Medina, I. Ezquerra, S. Garcia-Perez, and J. Monclus, “Quality of public space and sustainable development goals: analysis of nine urban projects in Spanish cities,” High. Educ. Press, vol. 12, pp. 477–495, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2023.01.002.

[12] A. Shukla, P. Chhabra, and V. Bhati, “Optimising Park Utilization in Urban India: Assessing the Impact of Walkability and Pedestrian Amenities on Neighbourhood Park Usage in Jalandhar City,” Civ. Eng. Archit., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2634–2647, 2024, doi: 10.13189/cea.2024.120411.

[13] A. Mela, E. Tousi, and G. Varelidis, “Assessing Urban Public Space Quality: A Short Questionnaire Approach,” Urban Sci., vol. 9, no. 56, pp. 1–27, 2025, doi: 10.3390/urbansci9030056.

[14] Y. Xu and X. Ma, “Assessing Urban Street Vitality Through Visual and Auditory Perception: A case study of historic urban area in Guangzhou, China,” IRSPSD Int., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 57–76, 2024.

[15] Z. H. Aljamily, M. A. S. R. Mahmoud, L. M. M. Ahmed, and E. A. M. Ali, “Assessment of urban spaces from the perspective of universal urban design. (Universal urban design from theory to practice),” J. Eng. Sci., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 78–95, 2022, doi: 10.21608/JESAUN.2021.101331.1084.

[16] M. D. N. Kiswari, N. Yuliastuti, and B. Sudarwanto, “Community Behavior in Public Gray Open Spaces, Case Study: Merbau Square, Banyumanik-Semarang,” Civ. Eng. Archit., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 3040–3052, 2024, doi: 10.13189/cea.2024.120440.

[17] B. Murgante, R. Valluzzi, and A. Annunziata, “Developing a 15-minute city: Evaluating urban quality using configurational analysis. The case study of Terni and Matera, Italy,” Appl. Geogr., vol. 162, no. December 2023, p. 103171, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103171.

[18] F. Zubaidi, N. Amalia, and D. Septyana, “Developing The Public Spaces Alternative in Palu City By the AHP-COPRAS Method,” IRSPSD Int., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 201–220, 2024.

[19] M. Abouhassan, R. Anwar, and S. Elkhateeb, “Humanizing Public Open Spaces in Jeddah: The Case of Prince,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 2551, pp. 1–25, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17062551.

[20] I. Rakonjac, A. Zoric, I. Rakonjac, J. Milosevic, J. Maric, and D. Furundzic, “Increasing the Livability of Open Public Spaces during Nighttime: The Importance of Lighting in Waterfront Areas,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 6058, pp. 1–25, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14106058.

[21] T. Santos, F. Ramalhete, R. Juliao, and N. Pires, “Sustainable living neighbourhoods: Measuring public space quality and walking environment in Lisbon,” Geogr. Sustain., vol. 3, pp. 289–298, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.002.

[22] C. E. Hacini, Y. Bada, and C. Pihet, “The Mobility of People with Disability: Between Urban Accessibility and Urban Attractiveness. A Case Study from Algiers, Algeria,” IRSPSD Int., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 38–57, 2022, doi: 10.14246/irspsd.10.2_38.

[23] M. Itair, I. Shahrour, and I. Hijazi, “The Use of the Smart Technology for Creating an Inclusive Urban Public Space,” Smart Cities, vol. 6, pp. 2484–2498, 2023, doi: 10.3390/smartcities6050112.

[24] L. Shen, Y. Li, S. Lan, and M. Yao, “Social Benefits Evaluation of Rural Micro-Landscapes in Southeastern Coastal Towns of China — The Case of Jinjiang, Fujian,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 8036, pp. 1–27, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14138036.

[25] J. He, F. Ren, J. Dong, H. Zhang, W. Yan, and J. Liu, “Social inequity of park accessibility in Taiyuan: highlighting the unfair layout of parks in second-tier cities of China and the relative role of contributors,” Geo-spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1118–1140, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10095020.2022.2125835.

[26] Z. Li, S. Cheng, L. Xiao, Y. Wei, and T. Fang, “Sustainability Benefit Evaluation and Optimization of Rural Public Spaces Under Self-Organization Theory,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 1019, pp. 1–34, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17031019.

[27] A. Reos-Llinares, S. Garcia-Domenech, and C. L. Marcos, “SUSTAINABILITY OF URBAN HERITAGE: Case Study in Altea and La Vila Joiosa (Alicante, Spain),” Rev. Urbano, vol. 45, pp. 64–75, 2022, doi: 10.22320/07183607.2022.25.45.06.

[28] F. Ding, Y. Ren, S. Goudos, and Y. Zhao, “Analysis of Public Space in Historic Districts Based on Community Governance and Neural Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 81021–81032, 2023.

[29] J. Jimenez-Caldera, J. L. Serrano-Montes, R. Perez-Arevalo, J. Rodrigo-Comino, L. Salvati, and A. Caballero-Calvo, “A Conceptual Model for Planning and Management of Areas of Public Space and Meeting in Colombia,” Land, vol. 11, no. 1922, pp. 1–21, 2022, doi: 10.3390/land11111922.

[30] M. D. Brankovic, M. Igic, J. Dekic, and M. Ljubenovic, “Impact of Urban Densification on Outdoor Microclimate and Design of Sustainable Public Open Space in Residential Neighborhoods: A Study of Niš, Serbia,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 1573, pp. 1–34, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17041573.

[31] Z. Zhang and Q. Sun, “Integrated Design Methods for Sustainable Public Seating in Urban Communities — A Shanghai Case Study,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 9096, pp. 1–24, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16209096.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles