Multi-Purpose Open Space (MPOS) Evaluation to Support Inclusivity in Public Spaces PKOR Way Halim, Bandar Lampung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v15i2.576Keywords:
Inclusivity, Multi-Purpose Open Space (MPOS), PKOR Way Halim, Public Open Space, SustainabilityAbstract
Public open spaces play a key role in sustainable urban development through their social, ecological, and cultural functions. However, their planning and design in many cities remain largely exclusive and have yet to fully incorporate inclusivity and sustainability principles. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the Way Halim Sports Activity Center (PKOR Way Halim) in Bandar Lampung as an inclusivity- and sustainability-based Multi-Purpose Open Space (MPOS) in supporting adaptive public spaces. The study uses a descriptive mixed-methods approach, combining a questionnaire survey of 100 purposively selected respondents with structured field observations. Data were analyzed using percentage-based descriptive statistics, categorized as low (<40%), moderate (40–60%), and high (>60%). The results show that social inclusivity, covering user diversity, spatial comfort, and activity flexibility, achieved high performance (64.8%–77%). In contrast, basic physical accessibility was low, particularly in disability-friendly facilities (38%) and adaptive lighting for visually impaired users (39.2%). Supporting facilities and user participation were rated moderate (42.8%–57%). PKOR Way Halim has strong potential to be developed as an MPOS but requires targeted design and policy interventions focused on universal accessibility. Strengthening public open space planning and management policies, including technical regulations for disability-friendly facilities, is essential to enhance its functionality and sustainability.
Downloads
References
[1] J. Zivkovic, K. Lalovic, M. Milojevic, and A. Nikezic, “Multifunctional public open spaces for sustainable cities: Concept and application,” Facta universitatis - series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 205–219, 2019, doi: 10.2298/FUACE190327012Z.
[2] K. Peinhardt, “Uses & Activities: How to Create Multi-Purpose Places,” Project for Public Spaces.
[3] K. Nathiwutthikun, A. Wannasilpa PEERAPUN, and A. Khaisri PAKSUKCHARERN, “THE LOGIC OF MULTI-USE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACES IN CHIANG MAI CITY,” Sep. 2012.
[4] D. Agustina et al., “PERAN RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU MULTIFUNGSI DALAM MENINGKATKAN RESILIENSI KOTA TERHADAP PERUBAHAN IKLIM,” in Seminar Nasional Arsitektur Pertahanan 2025, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, 2025.
[5] C. Sion, “Aksesibilitas Yang Inklusif Ruang Terbuka Publik (Studi Kasus: Taman Gajah),” Institut Teknologi Sumatera, 2022.
[6] D. Nafiza, R. Siregar, W. Dwi Purnamasari, and E. B. Kurniawan, “Pengembangan Ruang Publik Ramah Perempuan Pada Taman Ahmad Yani Kota Medan,” 2025.
[7] United Nation Development Programme, “Open and Inclusive public sphere,” 2024.
[8] H. Zheng, “The Dynamic Mutuality of Public Space and Civic Culture: In Case of Casa Del Prado in Balboa Park,” Nov. 28, 2024. doi: 10.20944/preprints202411.2180.v1.
[9] L. Aol, “Role of Arts and Cultural Events in Community Development and Social Cohesion,” International Journal of Arts, Recreation and Sports, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 39–51, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.47941/ijars.1943.
[10] J. Hou, “Urban Community Gardens as Multimodal Social Spaces,” 2017, pp. 113–130. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4113-6_6.
[11] J. Luo, I. Y. Jian, E. H. W. Chan, and W. Chen, “Green Open Spaces as Catalysts of Culture-Led Urban Regeneration: Case Study of Yuyuan Cultural Heritage Neighborhood, Shanghai,” 2024, pp. 367–376. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-7965-3_32.
[12] X. Gao, “Research on the Impact of Cultural Festivals on Urban Regeneration,” Highlights in Art and Design, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–5, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.54097/8823wf92.
[13] A. John, P. K. Tyagi, and V. Nadda, “Community Engagement Through Event Tourism,” 2024, pp. 153–163. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6819-0.ch012.
[14] K. Baumann, B. Stokes, F. Bar, and B. Caldwell, “Designing in ‘constellations,’” in Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Aug. 2016, pp. 5–8. doi: 10.1145/2948076.2948083.
[15] Y. Cui, M. Gjerde, and B. Marques, “Mapping and Assessing Effective Participatory Planning Processes for Urban Green Spaces in Aotearoa New Zealand’s Diverse Communities,” Land (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 9, p. 1412, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/land13091412.
[16] S. Maulidyah and R. A. Pratiwi, “FLEKSIBILITAS RUANG TERBUKA PUBLIK HIJAU DI LAPANGAN KALPATARU PASCA PANDEMI COVID-19,” Journal of Architectural Design and Development, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 133–145, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.37253/jad.v4i2.8616.
[17] F. T. Nugrahaini, R. Azizah, Muhtadi, and I. R. Rosyid, “Multifunctional Open Space Facilities Planning in A Rural Area,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2877–2885, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.13189/cea.2023.110803.
[18] U. A. Fitri and R. Putra Kusuma, “Analisis Kebijakan Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta dalam Membangun Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak (RPTRA) Kaitannya Berdasarkan Kerangka SDGs Poin 11,” Sep. 2017.
[19] L. Stafford, M. Novacevski, R. Pretorius, and P. Rogers, “The makings of disability-inclusive sustainable communities: Perspectives from Australia,” Urban Governance, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113–121, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ugj.2024.03.004.
[20] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bandar Lampung, Kota Bandar Lampung dalam Angka 2025, vol. 39. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bandar Lampung, 2025.
[21] A. E. Demirel and M. Erkılıç, “Mapping the inclusive design literature in the built environment: Towards an expanded experiential definition of inclusivity,” Des. Stud., vol. 101, p. 101354, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2025.101354.
[22] Y. LU, R. CHEN, B. CHEN, and J. WU, “Inclusive green environment for all? An investigation of spatial access equity of urban green space and associated socioeconomic drivers in China,” Landsc. Urban Plan., vol. 241, p. 104926, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104926.
[23] Iberdola, “Moving towards a greener and more inclusive future : Diversity and Inclusion Report 2023,” Iberdola. Accessed: Feb. 25, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.iberdrola.com/social-commitment/diversity-inclusion/diversity-inclusion-report
[24] S. Abouzaglo, D. Patel, and T. Annaswamy, “Inclusivity in Design: Integrating human-centered methodologies in disability research,” Disabil. Health J., vol. 18, no. 4, p. 101840, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101840.
[25] T. Makkonen and T. Inkinen, “Inclusive smart cities? Technology-driven urban development and disabilities,” Cities, vol. 154, p. 105334, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105334.
[26] H. Fors, Å. Ode Sang, P. N. Bengtsson, J. Svännel, and T. B. Randrup, “Autism-friendly public landscape architecture,” Urban For. Urban Green., vol. 115, p. 129181, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129181.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Septi Maulidyah, Rizka Nabilah, Martin Muljana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
